Donald Stirling and “Inside Out” in LA

Let me begin with an admission of guilt: After 25 years of boarding school life, when I run out of toothpaste, my first impulse is to call maintenance and shout, “Help!” I make no bones about it; I am soft. But even a marshmallow like me was taken aback by the self-congratulatory air of the LA Clippers, who after hearing that their owner, the morally bankrupt Donald Stirling, had made racist remarks, decided to wear their sweatshirts inside out as a sign of protest. Even if you throw in their also wearing black socks, the Clippers can hardly be accused of “Going Gandhi.”

While most fans applaud the players for their course of action, I think the Clippers missed a unique opportunity to make a statement. For example, what might have happened last Saturday when the story first broke, if as a sign of protest, the players had simply boycotted their game against the Golden State Warriors? After all, even a playoff game is just a GAME. And the fact that the players might have actually sacrificed something (their salaries), would have said something meaningful — and perhaps even memorable.

On a more practical front, consider, too, what ABC/ESPN might have done in order to fill that prime time slot. Something tells me that, given the interest in the issue, they would not have re-run “Heidi.” Just imagine how Charles Barkley might have filled 3 hours of precious airtime? Talk about “Must See TV’!

Sacrifice is something we all try to avoid, but it’s the price people pay when it comes to important moral issues. Something tells me we wouldn’t remember Rosa Parks, if she’d stayed at the back of the bus – even if she had worn her hat backwards.

Try to imagine an aging Chris Paul someday trying to explain all of this to his grandchildren, “Yes, indeed, back in ’14 when Donald Stirling said those terrible, terrible things, I wore my warm up shirt inside out!”

Can’t you just hear those kids’ saying, “Gramps, you are so ‘rad’! Some revolutionaries storm the Bastille, but you, you had the courage to head to the hosiery section at Harry Rosen!”


8 thoughts on “Donald Stirling and “Inside Out” in LA

  1. Love this. Is it a lack of community? A missing sense of belonging, or caring beyond oneself? It really is pathetic when you state it so clearly. I think I protested more intensely in grade 8 when we rallied to get bermuda shorts included on the dress code.

  2. “By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is
    noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by
    experience, which is the bitterest.”


  3. Good one. Remember it when your students take over the admin building

    Sent from my iPhone



    Patrick F. Bassett, President Heads Up Educational Consulting 7950 Bonnie Briar Loop Gainesville, VA 20155-2818 (703) 743-2604 Home/Office-VA (303) 736-8356 Home/Office-CO (202) 746.5444 Mobile-PFB (202) 230-4439 Mobile-BAB (877) 903-4601 Fax barbbassett@comcast.met

    “Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment.” -Mark Twain


    1. You make a good argument… Now that I think about it, Harry Rosen’s socks are REALLY expensive, so perhaps the sacrifice of those thoughtful Clippers was a strong moral statement in and of itself?

      Furthermore, wearing those jerseys inside out must have been uncomfortable! Why, just consider the possible chafing involved! The more I think about it, the more I think that facing down Bull Connor was probably a piece of cake, compared to what those fearless players dealt with last Saturday!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s